h4831 vs h4831sc Secrets
h4831 vs h4831sc Secrets
Blog Article
I'm an actual supporter of your H4831 powder. I get good velocity and precision outside of any caliber I have experimented with it in. From your twenty five-06 up to your 338 it is my go to powder of alternative. I check out all types of powders when working up loads, even so the H4831 usually seems to come out on best for accuracy and velocity when the case is from the 06 class or larger sized.
H4831 will operate from the Swift but not actual properly. You can never get the pressures you will need for consistency While using the .223. 760, or H414 will be much better but for some reason I ain't the biggest fan of most ball powders.
What is the real difference? Compression. With no Extraordinary/heavy compression associated with the prolonged grain 7828, the pressure curve was altered along with the load fell aside.
Minnesota H4831SC is my head to within the 7mm Rem Mag, but I'm conserving the minimal I have remaining for tumble 2021. I would start off reduced and perform your way up, determined by what load data you evaluate for this combo the min/max loads are everywhere in the board.
My expertise is that the SC and SSC loaded to the exact same pounds given that the extensive cut shows a decreased velocity.
Did you ever try out H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Shooting 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with standard chamber. Thinking What to anticipate with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
Nampa, Idaho h4831 vs h4831sc In my encounter the only real true difference is that the shortcut meters improved by means of reloading machines. When It is really loaded theres no purposeful big difference. I have heard that the shortcut could possibly have a tiny bit speedier melt away charge but It appears insignificant.
excaliber stated: I've identified the exact reverse being legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and Similarly precise powder in my 300 Get Mag.
I've uncovered the exact opposite being accurate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and equally correct powder in my three hundred Win Mag.
Liberalism; The extremely hard but accepted Idea that it's completely possible to select up a turd with the thoroughly clean conclude.
If there is not any load data it can be due to the fact this powder just isn't suitable for this cartridge. Ordinarily one particular is not going to find just one powder to fit all cartridges, as well as household of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you will be asking about h4831 vs h4831sc won't perform. Simply click to increase...
Yes, You may use the exact same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, even so the SC Variation could allow you to get a little bit far more in predicaments where you are maxing out case quantity Along with the standard powder prior to reaching tension limitations.
Nevertheless IMR 4831 and H4831SC are various powders, you'll discover that in several instances, exactly where one of them is stated one other will probably be too. Also, you will discover there is a fairly consistent marriage concerning them with reference to mentioned loads.
The container didn't provide the "Excessive" brand on it. A coworker and I then swapped h4831sc load data some powder, And that i ended up with A different pound of H4831SC, this a single With all the "Severe" brand on it.