FASCINATION ABOUT H4831SC LOAD DATA

Fascination About h4831sc load data

Fascination About h4831sc load data

Blog Article

Your session is about to timeout as a result of inactivity. Simply click OK to increase your time and efforts for an additional 0 minutes.

I have applied H4831 (and H4831SC), And that i utilize it. There are not many cartridges that I utilize it for as I look often to gravitate to other powders. On the other hand, I can't claim that it isn't going to work. It is just that some other powders operate better for any specified cartridge. As an illustration, in the 280, H4831 gave me great velocity and very great groups with Nosler one hundred forty AB. However, RL19 was marginally far better in precision, even though the velocity was just about similar.

This is one of the most significant factors reloaders are admonished to implement new data only; and to begin small every time you get a new large amount of powder. You don't seriously know (Unless of course the business informs you so) that your new great deal of powder was even made at precisely the same manufacturing unit because the powder you got a few years back.

Minnesota H4831SC is my check out inside the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am saving the very little I have remaining for fall 2021. I would start out reduced and get the job done your way up, according to what load data you evaluate for this combo the min/max loads are all over the board.

Alaska The sc loads up somewhat far better but They can be the very same detail, 1 is simply small Slice. I’ve even combined the normal 1 Using the SC and gotten the same results as using a person or the opposite.

I understand, tough periods. H4831SC will certainly function, I just failed to like the situation density when loaded long. I do not remember powder charge off the best of my head but I used to be launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps that is in which I normally purpose to generally be. Inside your situation using what you've got (and what I h4831 vs h4831sc must have completed) I'd start with the end of the bearing area of your bullet suitable for the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as you look for a velocity node.

i've utilized both and used the exact same costs and possess not been ready to notify any noticable variances with functionality. the SC Edition meters a little smoother is about all. any opinions??

The truth is, It is really even a smart idea to again down and perform up safely after you go from one lot to a different large amount of exactly the same powder.

Along with the quick cut Model powder comes as many as the base with the reduced shoulder so I still have numerous space.

The 55grs is everything I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I think that they have got slowed down h4831sc the swift h4831 vs h4831sc to show that their rifles are improved. It bug the hell away from me. I realize better. This is why I don't ever toss out my older manuals. I do invest in new manual continuously to stay up on new chambers and there loading. I exploit this 39grs in summers @ 100+ levels without any complications.

Kansas Town, MO I'd personally get whatever is out there right this moment. I’ve utilized both of those even though with my go to load and didn’t see nearly anything various general performance smart.

After looking through this article (and a lot of Other individuals, but this one particular is the most data pushed with numerous accredited shooters) I have stopped worrying about touching or staying in a magical distance from the lands, and commenced loading wherever I could enhance several elements of a load. Just my .02, ideally you can get one thing to operate for ya.

rayporter mentioned: i never discovered a variation aside from the frequent is like rolling cordwood onto the the pan. Click to increase...

I sawed a single in half to determine how thick the jackets have been, and so they have been easily two times as thick as a 50-grain hollow stage was. Ditto for your sixty four-grain Electric power Position, as these bullets are designed for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now know every thing I find out about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I do not know everything whatsoever concerning the 223. I question that you're going to get any place with that cartridge and 4831, but let us know the way it goes.

Report this page